College Football Playoff System

last updated: 11/08/2009
College football is currently the only major US sport that does not have a playoff system. Currently hundreds of college football teams battle each week to impress a computerized ranking system. Is it fair that a team can go undefeated and not get a chance to play for the National Championship? Is it fair that a computer program can rank the #2 team ahead of the #3 team by .001 and the #3 rank team does not get the chance to battle for the title? Of course the answers are no.

The main argument(s) in favor of the BCS is that all the possible scenarios that different teams have of making the championship game add fun and flavor. The current system knocks some very good teams out of contention of the National Title too early in the season. Often you only have a half a dozen or so teams playing meaningful games the last 3 or 4 weeks of the season. My playoff system is an eight team single elimination playoff that takes place during December and makes use of the prominent bowl sites. The system also takes into consideration whether or not a team won it's conference and it's BCS ranking.

No team not ranked in the Top 12 (arbitrary number that could change) could participate. Any conference champion ranked in the Top 12 would get an automatic bid. All remaining bids would go to the highest ranked non-conference winning teams.
All teams would be seeded based on their BCS ranking. First round games would be played at the home field of the highest ranked team. The semi-final and championship matchups would be played at a rotating BCS bowl site. Bowl sites that weren't involved could be used for other non playoff bowl games. Teams not in the 8 team playoff could still participate in bowl games like they currently do now. I am no longer advocating my 12 and 16 team playoff scenarios as they are not too realistic at this point. The pros are that no undefeated major conference team should be left out, it only takes three weeks to play and there will be more meaningful regular season games towards the tail end of the season. The cons are that it's possible a high ranking non-conference winner could get left out, or that an undefeated team that played a powder-puff schedule would get left out, but I'm not sure that last one is a con.


As of Nov 8, 2009 ... Current playoff would look like. Keep in mind that we are half way through the season so these invites will obviously change and I am using conference leader as opposed to conference champion.


Invited Teams
- Florida (SEC Leader)
- Texas (Big 12 Leader)
- TCU (Mountain West Leader)
- Cincinnati (Big East)
- Boise St (WAC Leader)
- Georgia Tech (Atlantic Coast)
- Ohio State (Big 10 Leader)
- Oregon (PAC 10 Leader)



Playoff Matchups
#5 Boise St. vs #4 Cincinnati
#8 Oregon vs #1 Florida
#6 Georgia Tech vs #3 TCU
#7 Ohio State vs #2 Texas


Remarks: This is what the 8 team playoff would look like if the season ended today. Of course, looking at what the playoff would look like before the season ends is just an "entertainment only" excercise. There will be some obvious movement in the rankings. Of course the biggest adjustment will come when Florida and Alabama battle it out for the SEC title. At the moment, Alabama is left out due to the high rankings of teams from traditionally lesser conferences (TCU, Cincinatti and Boise St.).